User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (BREW; Opera Mini/5.1.191/27.1591; U; en) Presto/2.8.119 240X400 LG VN27181T8045
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGVN27181T8045 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 5.1Presto 2.2Brew 2.0Mobile Deviceyes0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.80closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 5.1.191close LGVN270mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18998 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 5.1Presto Brew LGVN27181T8045smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 5.1.191close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 5.1.191closeBREW LGVN27181T8045closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 5.1.191close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05699 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 5.1.191Presto 2.8.119 LGLG VN27181closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42096 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 5.1Presto 2.8.119Brew LGVN27181mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.80closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mini 5.1close LGVN270Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:53 | by ThaDafinser