User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux armv7l; pt-PT; rv:1.9.2.3pre) Gecko/20100723 Firefox/3.5 Maemo Browser 1.7.4.8 RX-51 N900
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet-1.yml
MicroB 1.7.4.8Maemo Gecko NokiaN900tablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Maemo 1.7 Linux Mobile Phoneyes0.047 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.5closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.17898 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
MicroB 1.7Gecko Maemo NokiaN900tabletyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.5closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Maemo Browser 1.7.4closeMaemo closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Maemo Browser 1.7.4.8closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.08299 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.5Gecko 20100723Maemo closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40896 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
MicroB 1.7.4Gecko 1.9.2Maemo NokiaN900mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.5closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 3.5closeLinux armv7l NokiaN900Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:53 | by ThaDafinser