User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.3; cs-cz; HTC_DesireS Build/GRI40) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCDesireS Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.3HTCDesire SMobile Phoneyesyes0.14801 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.3HTCDesire Smobile-browseryescloseclose0.26297 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.3HTCDesireSsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.3.3closeAndroid 2.3.3HTCDesireScloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.14299 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 533.1Android 2.3.3HTC Desirecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42696 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.3HTCDesire Smobile:smartyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3HTCDesire SSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.08201 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:53 | by ThaDafinser