User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-096.php
Firefox 29.0Win8.1 6.329.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 29.0Gecko 29.0Win8.1 6.3Windows DesktopDesktop0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 29.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 29.0closeWindows 6.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.17998 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 29.0Gecko Windows 8.1desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 29.0closeWindows 8.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 29.0closeWindows 8.1 closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 29.0closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.05699 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 29.0Gecko 20100101Windows Windows NT 6.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40596 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 29.0Gecko 29.0Windows 8.1desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 29.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 29.0closeWindows 8.1Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:52 | by ThaDafinser