User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Android; Opera Mini/7.6.35766/35.5706; U; en) Presto/2.8.119 Version/11.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Opera Mini 7.6.35766 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 7.6Presto 2.2Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.024 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 7.6.35766closeAndroid OperaMini 5mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18198 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 7.6Presto Android yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 7.6.35766closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 7.6.35766closeAndroid closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 7.6.35766closeAndroid closecloseclosecloseclose0.04999 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 7.6.35766Presto 2.8.119Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41796 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 7.6Presto 2.8.119Android mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.10closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mini 6close OperaMini 5Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.11901 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:52 | by ThaDafinser