User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.1; v89_jbl1a668 Build/JOP40D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/28.0.1500.94 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Xianghev89_jbl1a66 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 28.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.027 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.94closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 28.0.1500.94closeAndroid 4.2.1StarS7189mobile-browseryescloseclose0.28397 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 28.0Blink Android 4.2smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.94closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 28.0.1500closeAndroid 4.2.1Xianghev89_jbl1a66closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 28.0.1500.94WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40796 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 28.0.1500.94Blink Android 4.2.1v89_jbl1a668mobile:smartyescloseclose0.10801 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.94closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 28closeAndroid 4.2StarS7189Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.09001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:52 | by ThaDafinser