User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Java; U; MIDP-2.0; fr-FR; SAMSUNG-SGH-T669) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.5.0.449 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
UC Browser 9.5JAVA unknownunknown SamsungGravity TMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.5U2 JAVA SamsungGravity TMobile Phoneyesyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19898 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.5 SamsungSGH-T669smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.5.0close SamsungSGH-T669closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.07799 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.5.0.449 SamsungMobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43596 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.5Gecko SamsungSGH-T669mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.029 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:50 | by ThaDafinser