User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux mips; U; InettvBrowser/2.2 (00014A;SonyDTV115;0002;0100) ; CC/JPN; en) Presto/2.9.167 Version/11.50
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/sony.yaml
Opera Devices 3.1 Presto 2.9.167SonySmart TVtelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 11.50Presto 2.9Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 11.50closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18698 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 11.50Presto GNU/Linux SonyDTV115smartphoneyes0.014 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 11.50closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 11.50closeLinux SonyDTV115closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 11.50closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.05999 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet TV Browser 2.2Presto 2.9.167Linux Sony Digital TVcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40996 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Devices 3.1Presto 2.9.167 SonySmart TVtelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.50closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:50 | by ThaDafinser