User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (H11T; like Gecko; OpenBrowser) NetFront/3.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/carrier-emobile.yaml
NetFront 3.4 ToshibaH11Tmobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 3.4NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.054 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 3.4close AccessNetFront Ver. 3.4mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21898 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront 3.4NetFront 0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 3.4close closeclosecloseclose0.018 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.04999 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
NetFront closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41096 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 3.4 ToshibaH11Tmobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
emobile closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
NetFront 3.4close AccessNetFront Ver. 3.4Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:50 | by ThaDafinser