User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.6; En-US; Aqua Trendy Build/GRK39F) AppleWebKit/534.31 (KHTML, Like Gecko) UCBrowser/9.0.2.299 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/534.31
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
IntexAqua Trendy Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.0U3 Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.048 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 534.31closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser 9.0.2.299closeAndroid 2.3.6GenericAndroid 2.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.29897 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.0WebKit Android 2.3IntexAqua Trendysmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.0.2closeAndroid 2.3.6IntexAqua Trendycloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.05299 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.0.2.299WebKit 534.31Android 2.3.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40796 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.0Webkit 534.31Android 2.3.6IntexAqua Trendymobile:smartyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 2.3Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:50 | by ThaDafinser