User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/535.22+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Chromium/17.0.963.56 Chrome/17.0.963.56 Safari/535.22+ Debian/7.0 (3.4.2-2.1) Epiphany/3.4.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Epiphany 3.4.2Debian 7.0WebKit desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chromium 17.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.04801 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 17.0.963.56closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Epiphany 3.4.2closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19198 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Epiphany 3.4WebKit Debian 7.0desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 17.0.963.56closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Epiphany 3.4.2closeDebian closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Epiphany 3.4.2closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.28297 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Epiphany 3.4.2WebKit 535.22Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43896 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
GNOME Web 3.4.2Webkit 535.22Debian 7.0desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 17.0.963.56closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 17.0.963.26closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:50 | by ThaDafinser