User agent detail

ELinks/0.11.1 (textmode; FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE i386; 127x77-2)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-bsd.yaml
ELinks 0.11.1FreeBSD 6.1 desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
ELinks 0.11 FreeBSD Desktop0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
ELinks 0.11.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Elinks 0.11.1closeBSD 6.1-RELEASEdesktop-browsercloseclose0.19798 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Elinks 0.11Text-based FreeBSD 6.1desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
ELinks 0.11closeFreeBSD 6.1closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
ELinks 0.11.1closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
ELinks FreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40296 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
ELinks 0.11.1 FreeBSD 6.1desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:49 | by ThaDafinser