User agent detail

ia_archiver/8.7 (Windows NT 5.0; )
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
ia_archiver 8.7 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesInternet ArchiveBot/Crawler0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
ia closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesAlexaclose0.18798 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesAlexa CrawlerSearch bot0.001 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeWindows 2000closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesia_archiverclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesia_archiverCrawler0.06499 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Windows Windows NT 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.36396 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesAlexaclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:49 | by ThaDafinser