User agent detail

Opera/30.0.1835.59 (X11; Linux i686; Ubuntu/14.10) Presto/2.12.388 Version/29.16 AppleWebKit/599.0+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/41.0.2272.118 Safari/537.36 FAST-WebCrawler/3.8
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/bots/generic.yaml
yesFAST Web Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 29.16closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 30.0.1835.59closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.20098 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 30.0.1835.59closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesFAST-WebCrawlerclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 29.16closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07899 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 41.0.2272.118Presto 2.12.388Linux 14.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40596 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesFAST Web Crawlerclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.118closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:48 | by ThaDafinser