User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (MIDP-2.0; U; Adr 2.3.4; ru; GT-I9100) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.6.0.514 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
UC Browser 9.6Android 2.3unknown SamsungGalaxy S IIMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.6U2 Android 2.3SamsungGalaxy S IIMobile Phoneyesyes0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close MotorolaXT862mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26697 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.6 Android 2.3SamsungGALAXY S IIsmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.6.0closeAndroid 2.3.4SamsungGT-I9100closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.04599 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.6.0.514 SamsungGalaxy S IIcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40396 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.6Gecko Android 2.3.4SamsungGalaxy S IImobile:smartyescloseclose0.029 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 2.3SamsungGT-I9100Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:47 | by ThaDafinser