User agent detail

Opera/8.02 (Qt embedded; Linux armv4ll; U) [en] SONY/COM1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/pda/mylo.yaml
Opera 8.02Qtopia SonyMylo 1pda Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 8.02Presto 1.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 8.02closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 8.02closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.28497 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 8.02Presto GNU/Linux SonyD30smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 8.02closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 8.2closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 8.02closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07699 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 8.2 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41296 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 8.02 Qtopia SonyMylo 1pdacloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 8.02closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l HTCMDA Vario VFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:47 | by ThaDafinser