User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; HTC_Touch_Diamond2_T5353; Windows Phone 6.5.3.5)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-windowsmobile.yaml
Mobile Internet Explorer 6.0Windows Mobile 6.5 HTCTouch Diamond 2mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 6.0Trident WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 6.0closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.19498 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows Phone 6.5HTCTouch Diamond2 T5353smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows XPcloseWindows Phonecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 6.0closeWindows Phone 6.5HTCTouch_Diamond2_T5353closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.05299 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows Windows NT 5.1HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40596 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Mobile Internet Explorer 6.0 Windows Mobile 6.5HTCTouch Diamond 2mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 6.0closeWindows XPFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:46 | by ThaDafinser