User agent detail

Pachacutec/0.5 (qpImageBuilders.com); WordPress/3.1; http://contacto-latino.com/news
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
WordPress 3.1 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Pachacutec 0.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesWordPressclose0.18698 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesWordPressclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesWordPressclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:46 | by ThaDafinser