User agent detail

HTC-T9296/UCWEB2.3.0.182/47/32079
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCT9296 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
HTC-T9296 UCWEB2.3.0.182closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21698 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 2.3 HTCT9296smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 2.3.0close HTCT9296closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.3.0.182close closecloseclosecloseclose0.09799 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 2.3.0.182 HTC T9296closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40496 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 2.3Gecko HTCT9296mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:46 | by ThaDafinser