User agent detail

Mozilla/1.1 (compatible; MSPIE 2.0; Windows CE)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-windowsce.yaml
Pocket Internet Explorer 2.0Windows CE mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Netscape 1.0Gecko Desktop0.033 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Pocket Internet Explorer 2.0closeWindows CE mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19298 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows CE yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Pocket Internet Explorer 2.0;closeWindows CEclosecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 2.0closeWindows CE closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 1.1 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42796 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Pocket Internet Explorer 2.0 Windows CE mobile:featureyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:46 | by ThaDafinser