User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 3.0.1; en-us; HTC T9299+ For AT&T Build/GRJ22) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCT9299+ For AT&T Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 3.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 3.0.1GenericAndroid 3.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25498 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 3.0HTCT9299+ For AT&Tsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 3.0.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 3.0.1closeAndroid 3.0.1HTCT9299+ For AT&Tcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 3.0.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 533.1Android 3.0.1HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40596 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.4HTCHD7mobile:smartyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 16closeAndroid 3.0Tabletyesyescloseclose0.05401 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:46 | by ThaDafinser