User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux armv7l; InettvBrowser/2.2 (00014A;SonyDTV140;0001;0001) KDLRB2; CC/CHN) Presto/2.12.407 Version/12.50
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/sony.yaml
Opera Devices 3.4 Presto 2.12.407SonySmart TVtelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.50Presto 2.12Linux Smartphone OS Linux DesktopDesktop0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 12.50closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18698 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 12.50Presto GNU/Linux SonyKDLRB2tv0.013 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.50closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.50closeLinux SonyDTV140closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.50closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.12499 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet TV Browser 2.2Presto 2.12.407Linux Sony KDL-RB2 Digital TVcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40096 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Devices 3.4Presto 2.12.407 SonySmart TVtelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.50closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:46 | by ThaDafinser