User agent detail

Yeti-FeedItemCrawler/1.0 (NHN Corp.;+http://help.naver.com/robots/)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Yeti Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesTestCrawlerBot/Crawler0.034 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Yeti-FeedItemCrawler 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesclose0.20198 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesYeti/NaverbotSearch bot0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesYeticlose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesYetiCrawler0.06799 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesNaver Yeticlose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:46 | by ThaDafinser