User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (BeOS; U; Haiku BePC; xx; rv:1.8.1.10pre) Gecko/20080112
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-haiku.yaml
Haiku Gecko 1.8.1desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 1.8Gecko 1.8 Desktop0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Mozilla rv:1.8.1.10closeHaiku OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.17998 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Haiku OS desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.8closeBeOS closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla 1.8.1.10precloseHaiku closecloseclosecloseclose0.11499 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 1.8.1.10preGecko 20080112BeOS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41896 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Gecko 1.8.1Haiku desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:46 | by ThaDafinser