User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; de-de; SAMSUNG GT-I9
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-I9 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2SamsungGT-I9mobile-browseryescloseclose0.28597 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2SamsungGT-I9smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.2.2closeAndroid 4.2.2SamsungGT-I9closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android 4.2.2Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41396 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android 4.2.2SamsungGT-I9mobile:smartyescloseclose0.09101 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.047 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:45 | by ThaDafinser