User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3.5; Linux) KHTML/3.5.5 (like Gecko) (Kubuntu)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Konqueror 3.5Kubuntu KHTML desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Konqueror 3.5KHTML Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.026 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Konqueror 3.5closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18898 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Konqueror 3.5KHTML Kubuntu desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Konqueror 3.5;closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 3.5closeKubuntu closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Konqueror 3.5closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.057 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Konqueror 3.5 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40196 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Konqueror 3.5KHTML 3.5.5Kubuntu desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:45 | by ThaDafinser