User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.4; Zh-cn; LNV-Lenovo_A68e/Lenovo A68e_S011_110815; 480*320; CTC/2.0) Wangel/23
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LenovoA68e Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 2.3.4LenovoA68mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25797 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.3LenovoA68esmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 2.3.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.3.4closeAndroid 2.3.4LenovoA68ecloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android 2.3.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40296 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android 2.3.4LenovoA68mobile:smartyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.047 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:45 | by ThaDafinser