User agent detail

NokiaE52/031.012 (SymbianOS/9.3; U; Series60/3.2 Mozilla/5.0; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) AppleWebKit/525 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0 Safari/525
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/manufacturer-nokia-series60.yaml
Series60 3.2Webkit 525NokiaE52mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.026 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 3.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Nokia Web Browser closeSymbian OS 9.3NokiaE52mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19698 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia OSS Browser 3.2WebKit Symbian OS Series 60 3.2NokiaE52smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia S60 OSS Browser 031.012closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Services (WAP) Browser closeSymbian OS 9.3NokiaE52closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 Nokia BrowsercloseSymbianOS 9.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.08999 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser WebKit 525NokiaOS NokiaNokia E52closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40496 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 525Series60 3.2NokiaE52mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.0closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 9.3NokiaE52Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:44 | by ThaDafinser