User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020408
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-539.php
Mozilla 0.9Linux unknown0.9 unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 0.9Gecko 0.9Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.027 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Mozilla rv:0.9.9closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19098 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 0.9closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla 0.9.9closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.04499 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 0.9.9Gecko 20020408Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40396 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Gecko 0.9.9Linux desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:44 | by ThaDafinser