User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.2.1; de-at; HTC Desire Z 1.82.166.1 Build/FRG83D) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCDesire Z Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.2HTCDesireMobile Phoneyesyes0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.2.1GenericAndroid 2.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.24898 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.2HTCDesire Zsmartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.2.1closeAndroid 2.2.1HTCDesire Zcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.09899 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 533.1Android 2.2.1HTC Desire Zcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40996 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.2.1HTCDesire Zmobile:smartyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.2closeAndroid 2.2HTCDesire ZSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.052 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:44 | by ThaDafinser