User agent detail

J-PHONE/3.0/J-SH05
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/carrier-softbank.yaml
SharpJ-SH05mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
J-PHONE 3.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close SharpJ-SH05mobile-browseryescloseclose0.17998 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SoftbankJ-SH05smartphoneyes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
SharpJ-SH05mobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
SoftBank Mobile J-SH05closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SoftbankJ-SH05Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:43 | by ThaDafinser