User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/38.0.2125.104 Safari/537.36 OPR/25.0.1614.63
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 25.0Windows 8.1Blink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 25.0Blink Win8.1 6.3Windows DesktopDesktop0.16602 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 25.0.1614.63closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 25.0.1614.63closeWindows 6.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.18098 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 25.0Blink Windows 8.1desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 25.0.1614.63closeWindows 8.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 25.0.1614closeWindows 8.1 closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 38.0.2125.104closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.052 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 25.0.1614.63WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40796 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 25.0Blink Windows 8.1desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 25.0.1614.63closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 25.0.1614.50closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:43 | by ThaDafinser