User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:22.0) Gecko/ /22.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-436.php
Firefox 22.0Win8 6.222.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 22.0Gecko 22.0Win8 6.2Windows DesktopDesktop0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Mozilla rv:22.0closeWindows 6.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.17998 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows 8desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeWindows 8closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows 8 closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla 22.0closeWindows 8 closecloseclosecloseclose0.05599 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 22.0Gecko Windows Windows NT 6.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.59594 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Gecko 22.0Windows 8desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:43 | by ThaDafinser