User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; AOL 9.7; AOLBuild 4343.19; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/5.0; FunWebProducts)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
AOL 9.7.4343 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 9.0Trident 5.0Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 9.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
AOL Explorer 9.7closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.20698 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 9.0Trident Windows 7desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 9.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
AOL 9.7.4343closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
AOL 9.7closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.07999 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 9.0Trident 5.0Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.48495 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
AOL Desktop 9.7Trident 5.0Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 9.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 11(Compatibility View)closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:43 | by ThaDafinser