User agent detail

CWEB/2.0 (Linux; U; Adr 2.1-update1; en-US; E10i) U2/1.0.0 UC \x11@0C75@/8.2.0.242 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-3.yml
Android 2.1 Sony EricssonXperia X10 minismartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
CWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeAndroid Sony EricssonXperia X10 Minimobile-browseryescloseclose0.27397 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android 2.1Sony EricssonXperia X10 minismartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41096 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser Gecko Android Sony EricssonXperia X10 Minimobile:smartyescloseclose0.04401 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:43 | by ThaDafinser