User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; ar-ae) AppleWebKit/534.35 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.65 Safari/534.35 Puffin/2.10977AP
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Puffin 2.10977 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Puffin 2.0WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.15201 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 11.0.696.65closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Puffin 2.10977closeAndroid mobile-browseryescloseclose0.17998 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Puffin 2.10977WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 11.0.696.65closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Puffin 2.10977closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 11.0.696.65closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.11499 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Puffin 2.10977WebKit 534.35 Android Phonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.36796 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Puffin 2Webkit 534.35Android mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 11.0.696.65closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:42 | by ThaDafinser