User agent detail

Lenovo-A65/S204 Linux/2.6.35.7 Android/2.3 Release/12.07.2011 Browser/AppleWebKit533.1 Profile/ Configuration/
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LenovoA65 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.043 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Lenovo-A65 S204closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 2.3LenovoA65mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27997 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.3LenovoA65smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid 2.3LenovoA65closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40696 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.3LenovoA65mobile:smartyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 2.3closeAndroid 2.3LenovoA65Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.07201 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:42 | by ThaDafinser