User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; rv:33.0; ; Trident/5.0)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
yesFake IEBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake IEBot/Crawler0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Edge 33.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mozilla rv:33.0close desktop-browsercloseclose0.18298 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 33.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 33.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.08299 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 33.0Trident 5.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42496 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Trident 5.0 closeclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:41 | by ThaDafinser