User agent detail

Java/1.17
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-476.php
yesJava Standard LibraryBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesJava Standard LibraryBot/Crawler0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Java 1.17closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Java 1.17closeJVM 1.17software-librarycloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Java 1.17 0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesJavaCrawler0.09001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Java Runtime Environment 1.17 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
No result found
Woothee
v1.2.0
HTTP Library Javacloseclosecloseclosemiscclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.08601 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:41 | by ThaDafinser