User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.3; AQUILA 097-1006 Build/ICS.g12refM1006CMX.20120928) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/33.0.1750.117 Safari/537.36 OPR/20.0.1396.72047
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
CmxAQUILA 097-1006 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 20.0Blink Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 20.0.1396.72047closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 20.0.1396.72047closeAndroid 4.0.3GenericAndroid 4.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 20.0Blink Android 4.0yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 20.0.1396.72047closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 20.0.1396closeAndroid 4.0.3CmxAQUILA 097-1006closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.08801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 20.0.1396.72047WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 20.0Blink Android 4.0.3CMXAquila 097-1006tabletyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 20.0.1396.72047closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Tabletyesyescloseclose0.04901 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:40 | by ThaDafinser