User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Dragon/45.6.11.385 Chrome/45.0.2454.93 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-814.php
Dragon 45.6Win10 10.0unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Dragon 45.6Blink Win10 10.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 45.0.2454.93closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 45.0.2454.93closeWindows 10.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 45.0Blink Windows 10desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 45.0.2454.93closeWindows 10.0closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 45.0.2454closeWindows 10 closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 45.0.2454.93closeWindows 10 closecloseclosecloseclose0.09001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 45.0.2454.93WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Comodo Dragon 45.6Blink Windows 10desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 45.0.2454.93closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 45.0.2454.93closeWindows 8.1Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:40 | by ThaDafinser