User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; ST70104-2 Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/27.0.1453.90 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
TrekstorST70104-2 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 27.0WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.08001 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 27.0.1453.90closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 27.0.1453.90closeAndroid 4.0.4TrekStorST70104-2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25803 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 27.0WebKit Android 4.0smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 27.0.1453.90closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 27.0.1453closeAndroid 4.0.4TrekstorST70104-2closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.06001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 27.0.1453.90WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.39904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 27Blink Android 4.0.4TrekstorSurftab Breeze 7.0tabletyescloseclose0.037 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 27.0.1453.90closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 27closeAndroid 4.0TrekStorST70104-2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.06101 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:40 | by ThaDafinser