User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.3; xx; KFOT Build/IML74K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Silk/3.35 like Chrome/34.0.1847.137 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/tablet/os-fireos.yaml
Silk 3.35FireOS 2Blink 537.36AmazonKindle Firetabletyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Silk 3.35Blink Android 4.0AmazonKindle Fire 7Tabletyesyes0.036 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Silk 3.35closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 34.0.1847.137closeAndroid 4.0.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.24502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 34.0Blink Android 4.0AmazonKindle Firetabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.137closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Amazon Silk 3.35closeAndroid 4.0.3AmazonKindle Firecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.07201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Silk 3.35WebKit 537.36Fire OS AmazonKindle Fire (2nd Gen)closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Silk 3.35Blink FireOS 2AmazonKindle Firetabletyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.137closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 37closeAndroid 4.0AmazonKFOTTabletyesyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:39 | by ThaDafinser