User agent detail

Windows-Update-Agent/7.9.9600.17729 Client-Protocol/1.21
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-849.php
yesWindows-Update-AgentBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesWindows-Update-AgentBot/Crawler0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Windows-Update-Agent 7.9.9600.17729closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.24802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Windows desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:39 | by ThaDafinser