User agent detail

GT-N7102 Linux/3.0.13 Android/4.1.1 Release/01.25.2013 Browser/AppleWebKit534.30 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Mobile Safari/534.30 Android 4.0.1;
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-N7102 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.30closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1SamsungGalaxy Note IImobile-browseryescloseclose0.25303 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.1SamsungGT-N7102smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.0.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.0.1closeAndroid 4.1.1SamsungGT-N7102closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.09101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit Android 4.0.1Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.1.1SamsungGalaxy Note IImobile:smartyescloseclose0.027 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 18closeAndroid 4.1SamsungGT-N7102Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.047 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:39 | by ThaDafinser