User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Linux; U; Adr 4.1.2; en-US; LT26ii) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/8.2.0.242 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-3.yml
UC Browser 8.2.0.242Android 4.1.2 SonyXperia SLsmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.2U2 Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux SonyEricssonLT26imobile-browseryescloseclose0.25703 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.2 Android 4.1SonyXperia SLsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.2.0closeAndroid 4.1.2closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.2.0.242 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.51105 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.2Gecko Android 4.1.2SonyXperia SLmobile:smartyescloseclose0.028 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:39 | by ThaDafinser