User agent detail

OneBrowser/3.0 (SonyEricssonCK15i/R3AC024)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonCK15i Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
OneBrowser 3.0WebKit Mobile Phoneyesyes0.006 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
OneBrowser 3.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
OneBrowser 3.0close Sony Ericssontxt Promobile-browseryescloseclose0.20702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
ONE Browser 3.0WebKit Sony Ericssontxt profeature phoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
ONE Browser 3.0close SonyEricssonCK15icloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
OneBrowser 3.0 Sony EricssonSony Ericsson CK15icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.48105 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
OneBrowser 3.0 Sony Ericssontxt Promobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:38 | by ThaDafinser