User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; LG Google TV TV Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/29.0.1547.80 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/google.yaml
Chrome 29Google TV Blink 537.36LGG2 seriestelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 29.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.80closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 29.0.1547.80closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.25503 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 29.0Blink Android 4.2LGGoogle TV TVsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.80closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 29.0.1547closeAndroid 4.2.2LGGoogle TV TVcloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 29.0.1547.80WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 29Blink Google TV LGG2 seriestelevisioncloseclose0.027 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.80closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.08301 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:38 | by ThaDafinser