User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE or Firefox mutant; not on Windows server;) Daumoa/4.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-497.php
yesDaumoaBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesDaumoaBot/Crawler0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE orcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.22002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox Gecko Windows desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer orclose closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesDaumoaclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox Windows desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:38 | by ThaDafinser