User agent detail

[FBAN/FB4A;FBAV/3.9;FBBV/666389;FBDM/{density=1.0,width=320,height=480};FBLC/en_US;FBCR/o2 - de;FBPN/com.facebook.katana;FBDV/HTC Desire 200;FBSV/4.0.3;FBOP/18;FBCA/armeabi-v7a:armeabi;]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCDesire 200 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Facebook App WebKit Mobile Phoneyesyes0.051 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Facebook close HTCDesire 200mobile-browseryescloseclose0.39804 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Facebook 3.9 HTCDesire 200smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Facebook 3.9close HTCDesire 200closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
HTC Desirecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Facebook HTCDesire 200mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:37 | by ThaDafinser